home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: Proposal
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 1994 14:51:25 +0200 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <199406020955.LAA08391@blade.stack.urc.tue.nl> from "Erlend Nagel" at Jun 2, 94 11:55:27 am
- From: Annius.Groenink@cwi.nl (Annius Groenink)
- X-Face: "E3Hm]k]&:,OEP<{D2ixJf>-9[qOGLebNa0&cQyFL-a~)kTM3&&I"gFw=fJ]K%1IduGjOE`
- ZGu]&~G]QNGa7i/L!+#Xng<|+}HKYHj~5?fTInUEUh0$I1gBI7jrA!&_|e/pR1[cX:^xgJTPsrjA_9
- m8Zli[|.-u{]+c1(6C7mL*m`/_J\>.{4!:g
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
- >
- > Andre writes:
- > > I'm not too keen on programs using shifted/etc window gagdets - talk
- > > about non-intuitive procedure!
- >
- > True. The new ICFS program (Iconify server) uses such a method. Shift
- > CLOSER iconifies the window. But as it happens I often close the window
- > instead of iconifying it. To be honest, I don't like any action that
- > involves mouse and keyboard simultaneously. I use the mouse to tell the
- > computer things like 'THAT thing', 'THIS option', 'put it THERE' and the
- > keyboard for all other actions. But others may have a different opinion.
-
-
- Hm. Funny. I just introduced shift close for iconify in Edith as
- well. A new standard for iconification in Single TOSes?
-
- BTW, I actually have a toggle between shift = iconfy and shift = not iconify.
-
- --
- Annius V. Groenink | E-mail: avg@cwi.nl | Private & ZFC:
- CWI, Kruislaan 413 | Room: M233 | P.O. Box 12079
- 1098 SJ Amsterdam | Ext: 4077 | NL 1100 AB Amsterdam
- Netherland | Phone: +31 20 592 4077 | Phone: +31 20 695 9901
-